updated 10:44 PM UTC, May 2, 2020
Covid-19 Occupational Health and Safety Measures in Workplaces Covid-19
COVID-19 Guidelines for Cloth Face Masks
Combined NCCC Proposal on Risk Adjusted Approach
COVID-19 Consolidated Disaster Regulations
Get dressed and set goals: some routines not to break if coronavirus means you have to work from hom
Working at home to avoid coronavirus? This tech lets you (almost) replicate the office
It's not just the isolation. Working from home has surprising downsides
Coronavirus could spark a revolution in working from home. Are we ready?
Working from home: what are your employer's responsibilities, and what are yours?
COVID-19 Covid19 Temporary Employee I Employer Relief Scheme (C19 TERS) amended gazette complete
A+ A A-

Department of Correctional Services v Van Vuuren 1999 (20) ILJ 2297 Labour Appeal Court Decision

Department of Correctional Services v Van Vuuren 1999 (20) ILJ 2297 Labour Appeal Court Decision

FACTS: The respondent, a well qualified white female employee of the Appellant department, applied for a post at the St Albans prison in Port Elizabeth. After interviewing 31 applicants the interview panel recommended only 4 applicants for the post. The respondent was strongly recommended and head of the list. The decision to make the appointment rested with the Commissioner of Correctional Services and he decided not to appoint the respondent but appointed a black male instead.

The respondent approached the Industrial Court on the basis that the failure to appoint her amounted to an unfair labour practice. The Court ruled in her favour finding that the pre-condition for the implementation of the Department’s affirmative action policy, namely registration, had not occurred by the time the Commissioner made his decision. The appellant sought to overturn that finding on appeal.

HELD: The Commissioner was competent to decide whom to appoint to the post. He was further competent to do so in terms of s8(3) of the Interim Constitution, 1993, the affirmative action clause "designed to achieve the adequate protection and advancement of persons or groups or categories of persons disadvantaged by unfair discrimination, in order to enable their full and equal enjoyment of all rights and freedoms". This appointment is also in line with s212(2)(b) which states that the public administration of South Africa must be broadly representative of the South African community. In terms of s210(1)(a)(3) of the Interim Constitution the Public Services Commission is competent to give directions for appointments and promotions in the public service and in terms of s210(1)(a)(3) these directions should generally be implemented within 6 months. The Commissioner thus acted within his powers when he made the decision. Whilst he did not adhere to a fixed policy or principle in making his decision he gave careful consideration to the circumstances of the respondent, the demands for representativity in that particular post in the Eastern Cape as well as other relevant factors.The application was dismissed and the appeal succeeded with costs.

COMMENT: The implementation of affirmative action measures are entrenched in the Constitution of the Republic of South Africa. Registration of an Affirmative Action Policy is not a pre-requisite to implement affirmative action measures in the workplace.

Warning: count(): Parameter must be an array or an object that implements Countable in /home/gwdhmoih/public_html/templates/gk_news2/html/com_k2/templates/default/item.php on line 176
Gary Watkins

Gary Watkins

Managing Director


C: +27 (0)82 416 7712

T: +27 (0)10 035 4185 (Office)

F: +27 (0)86 689 7862

Website: www.workinfo.com
Login to post comments

HR Associations